![]() |
| Computer Juice Magazine |
|
|||||||
| Register | Site Spy | Member List | Donate | Unanswered Posts | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Forum Rules |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Since my first digital camera bought back in 2001, the pixels have shot up so much so you can have higher pixel than my old camera for a lot less money, even under £100 and under.
Guess what I've found out though, my old camera still produce better picture! Okay my old camera is 4 mp (cost £300-£400) and the new one is 7 mp (£100). Sorry if this has been discussed before but just to let you know of my findings 'that you get what you pay for'. |
|
#2
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Pixels aren't everything, pixels don't take into account component quality.
My System: The Hybrid Lappy
|
|
#3
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
ive got a 3.2mp canon bought last year for £100 and it still whips some of the 10mp cameras you can get today
__________________
__________________
The temperature inside this apple pie is over 1000 degrees.
If I squeeze it, a jet of molten bramley apple will squirt out. Could go your way; could go mine. Either way, one of us is going down!!!! My System: Mine
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pixel Shader 1.1 problems... | tekp | PC & Console Gaming | 4 | 4th May 2008 07:16 |
| Stuck pixel | rsteenoven | Graphics Cards & Monitors | 3 | 10th Mar 2008 12:47 |
| Desktop picture | tinkerbell | General Software Chat | 8 | 20th Nov 2007 13:21 |
| My first .gif picture that i made. come and look! | cheesepuff | Off Topic Discussion | 6 | 13th Nov 2007 19:47 |
| Picture dvd | tinkerbell | Multimedia, Drivers & Codecs | 2 | 3rd Sep 2007 08:51 |
| Tags |
| guide, picture, pixel, quality |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|