FX 5200 vs X1050
Relative of mine has a tiny Dell-proprietary little desktop that has space for one low-profile AGP and one low-profile PCI. The system itself is about as large as an Xbox 360.
He doesn't do mainstream gaming, only relatively old racing games which he usually can run at OK framerates (with a 82865G). He wants to put a new card in.
Right now I've been looking at the FX 5200 and the X1050 as options. There's a 6200 for about $60, too, but it's not "natively" low-profile and so I'd be a little worried about getting a bracket and fitting it.
The X1050 is much more expensive (around $80), while I can get the 5200 for $20 or so. There's not much of a difference, is there? He's running everything on a card without T&L, so I assume unless the jump is pretty high it's not worth it to get the X1050.
Not sure about these old cards, so any help would be appreciated.
__________________
"I loved the P182 so much that, when my wife's system was all noisy and needed all sorts of cleaning, I bought her one. Then, when I wanted a cat, I bought a P182. The P182 is not a cat per se, but it's still an excellent buy."
__________________
My System: 日夏子
Processor(s): Core 2 Duo E6400 2.13 -> 3.01ghz |
Motherboard: MSI P6N SLI Platinum LGA 775 |
RAM Memory: 2GB Patriot Extreme Performance |
Graphics Card(s): PNY 8800GTS 320MB |
Sound Card: Sound Blaster Xtremegamer 7.1 |
Hard Drive(s): 80GB + 500GB |
Optical Drive(s): 2x SATA |
Case / PSU: Antec 900 + 620W Aerocool zeroDBA |
Cooling: 4x 120mm Yate-Loon + 200mm top |
Network / Internet: Qwest |
Monitor(s): Dell 22" S2209W (1920x1080) |
Operating System(s): Windows XP + 7 |
|