|
|
#1
8th Jan 2009, 14:18
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Hi just read a review of AMDs new quad core cpu, and although its seems their on the right track,with a cooler quietier, 45nm process, ,they are or still seem to be playing catch-up, even with intels 2yo Q6600 (on a 65nm)which just lost at stock speeds but beat the new Phenom totally at overclocking, think ill stay with intel for new build still guys
http://www.custompc.co.uk/reviews/60...k-edition.html
__________________
__________________
If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker that came along would destroy civilization. A computer once beat me at chess But it was no match for me at kick boxing.
 My System: redden137
|
|
#2
9th Jan 2009, 16:42
|
|||
|
|||
|
i agree. the phenom 2 is an improvement to the phenom series but it cannot compare to any intel quad core, even the q9400 which is a little cheaper.
|
|
#3
10th Jan 2009, 18:57
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am and AMD user since I've started my IT profession. Its also my recommendation to friends...
but in office we use intel. honestly speaking I dont see much difference between the two.  ------------- Freeware OpenSource |
|
#4
11th Jan 2009, 05:45
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
bangs for bucks INTEL are far better for the home builder/overclocker
__________________
If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker that came along would destroy civilization. A computer once beat me at chess But it was no match for me at kick boxing.
|
|
#5
12th Jan 2009, 03:26
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Using the different chips I don't notice a difference.
__________________
My System: Custom Built v1.2
|
