lesser-equity

Magazine
Go Back   Computer Juice > Computer Hardware > CPUs, Motherboards & RAM


Register


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 28th May 2009, 07:44
New Member Group
 
for work on photoshop and corel draw
I want to have a computer

which cpu will be better
Intel E8500 Core 2 Duo Processor - 8200/- Indian Rupee - 3.16 GHz
http://www.intel.com/products/proces...e2duo+tab_spec

or

Intel Q6600 Core 2 Quad Processor - 8550/- Indian Rupee - 2.4GHz
http://www.intel.com/products/proces...ifications.htm

I am designing a book so I do dtp work myself - now what is better - high speed dual core or slow quad core
  #2  
Old 28th May 2009, 08:20
Donor Group
 
High speed dual core by far. A Phenom X3 720 or E8400/E8500 will destroy the Q6600 as Photoshop is not threaded.

http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/d...-CS-3,826.html
__________________
"I loved the P182 so much that, when my wife's system was all noisy and needed all sorts of cleaning, I bought her one. Then, when I wanted a cat, I bought a P182. The P182 is not a cat per se, but it's still an excellent buy."
__________________

My System: 日夏子

Processor(s):
Core 2 Duo E6400 2.13 -> 3.01ghz
Motherboard:
MSI P6N SLI Platinum LGA 775
RAM Memory:
2GB Patriot Extreme Performance
Graphics Card(s):
PNY 8800GTS 320MB
Sound Card:
Sound Blaster Xtremegamer 7.1
Hard Drive(s):
80GB + 500GB
Optical Drive(s):
2x SATA
Case / PSU:
Antec 900 + 620W Aerocool zeroDBA
Cooling:
4x 120mm Yate-Loon + 200mm top
Network / Internet:
Qwest
Monitor(s):
Dell 22" S2209W (1920x1080)
Operating System(s):
Windows XP + 7
  #3  
Old 28th May 2009, 10:19
Donor Group
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carbon View Post
Photoshop is not threaded.
I think CS4 is?

Depends which version you get, if I'm correct that is.

I'll go have a google.


Edit:

Ok, I had a quick look:

It seems that some, not all, but a lot more in CS4 than CS3, filters are multithreaded. (see list below)

I think what I was thinking of though is that it is now capable of GPU acceleration, to stop
Quote:
zooming looking slide-show like
If you use any other CS tools though, like the ones intended for video usage, they do use more multithreading.

Not sure if that affects your reccomendation Carbon?


Credit to mortifiedPenguin on techreports.com for this one.
Quote:
Regular Operations:

Single Threaded:
paint brush
blur/sharpen brush
eraser
dodge/burn/saturate
history brush
defining selection with marquee/lasso/magic wand
slice
crop
typing text
eye dropper
increasing canvas size (trivial operation but seems single threaded)
extract
3d model transformations (Photoshop extended only)

Multi Threaded (uses parts of all cores simultaneously):
heal tool
gradient tool
patch/heal tool preview/overlay
smudge
art history brush (loads primarily one core, but appears to utilize others to some degree)
quick select
moving around selections (moving the "marching ants" around, includes text boxes)
pan
zoom
pen tool
increasing image size (quickly drops to near 0% CPU utlization as it runs out of RAM and starts paging to disk)
decreasing image size (it's similar to increasing size in function but may use a different algorithm, so tested separately)
curves (rendering preview)
levels (rendering preview)
color balance (rendering preview)
Brightness/contrast
changing color mode to indexed
Free transform (some of the subfunctions appear to use predominantly one thread but still use the other cores)
liquify (both in liquify window and in applying final result)
pattern maker (may be RAM limited, usage fluctuates greatly)
vanishing point
black and white (sort of, requires rapid changing of values, otherwise trivial)
photo filter (see black and white)
posterize (see black and white, heavily uses 3 cores, maxes out one)
variations (see black and white)
opening multiple files (low load, but seems multithreaded)
Auto-merge to HDR with automatic alignment (alignment fully threaded, hdr merge partially)
HDR 32-bit to LDR 8-bit conversion (fully threaded)

Filters:

Single Threaded:
paint daubs
Charcoal
texturizer
glowing edges


Multi Threaded (uses parts of all cores simultaneously):
Colored Pencil
Cut out
Dry brush
Film grain
poster edges
water color
grain
torn edges
note paper
chrome
cross hatch
stamp
reticulation
box blur (completely multithreaded, fully uses all cores)
gaussian blur (completely multithreaded)
lens blur (potentially RAM limited, may utilize better with more RAM)
surface blur (completely multithreaded)
smart blur (potentially RAM limited, may utilize better with more RAM)
shape blur (completed multithreaded)
polar coordinates (completely multithreaded)
lens correction
unsharp mask
smart sharpen (heavily uses 3 cores, maxes out one)
noise (needs repeated application to load, otherwise trivial)
glass (heavily uses 3 cores, maxes out one)
zig zag (needs repeated application, otherwise trivial)
clouds (needs repeated application, otherwise trivial)
difference clouds (same as clouds)
Fresco
sharpen edges (needs repeated application to load, otherwise trivial)
plastic wrap
shear (needs repeated application to load, otherwise trivial; heavily uses 3 cores, maxes out one)
high pass (needs repeated application)
maximum
minimum
offseet (needs repeated application)


Potentially multithreaded (hard to tell even under repeated application):
neon glow
Accented edges
patch work
stained glass
Mosaic tiles
Shear
nVidia normal map filter (can only do once, repeated application not possible, appears multithreaded)
ocean ripple
fibers (can only do once, repeated application not possible, appears multithreaded)

Trivial (so fast I can't tell):
mosaic
__________________
"Why did they [PS3 Slim] stick with the UFO landing on a rectangle look" --- Nilay Patel; Engadget Ep. 160
__________________

My System: FordyPC

Processor(s):
Quad Q6600 Kentsfield 2.66@3.45GHz
Motherboard:
Asus P5Q/L PRO (Intel P43, ICH10)
RAM Memory:
PNY XLR8 4GB @ 1066MHz
Graphics Card(s):
PNY nVidia GeForce 9400 GT 512MB
Sound Card:
Hard Drive(s):
Seagate HDBarracuda 1x 1TB 1x 250GB
Optical Drive(s):
LG (HD)GGCH20L / LG GH22NP20AUAA50B
Case / PSU:
Antec Sonata III & Earthwatts 500W
Cooling:
Stock
Network / Internet:
Gigabit LAN, FireWire & WG111v2
Monitor(s):
2 x Acer P193WAd
Operating System(s):
XP PRO x86/XP PRO x64/Win7 RC1 x64
  #4  
Old 28th May 2009, 10:58
Donor Group
 
Even so clock speed will provide a benefit across the board for everything and a decent compromise is the X3 720. The Q6600 is outdated, even by Intel's scheme.
__________________
"I loved the P182 so much that, when my wife's system was all noisy and needed all sorts of cleaning, I bought her one. Then, when I wanted a cat, I bought a P182. The P182 is not a cat per se, but it's still an excellent buy."
Reply

Register
Thread Tools




Arabic Bulgarian Chinese (Simplified) Chinese (Traditional) Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Greek Hebrew Hungarian Italian Japanese Korean Latvian Lithuanian Norwegian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Serbian Slovak Spanish Swedish Thai Turkish Ukrainian

Copyright ©2006 - 2009 Computer Juice.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.