|
|
#1
9th Apr 2008, 14:24
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Well i was gonna buy the E8500 in a week or so with new board etc but now im not so sure, think i might wait a bit and see if this review is typical of the new cpu and if the price drops heres a quick quote
" The upcoming Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 looks to be a price versus performance winner from what we can tell from the time spent with our early sample. If the rumored price of $133 is correct and the retail versions overclock like ours did then this will be hands down one of the hottest dual-core processors this summer. Intel has perfected the 45nm process and every new processor series they release based on it exceeds our expectations. The Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 is one of those processors. When it came to performance, the Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 at default clock speeds was not hands down faster than the Intel Core 2 Duo E6750, but we'd pick the E7200 over it any day since it can be overclocked up to a 1333MHz FSB with just a single BIOS setting adjustment. Factor in overclocking beyond that and you have a price versus performance winner as overclocks over 50 percent are hard to ignore. Intel informed us that the Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 is a 65W part, but it seems like it might actually be less. Our power consumption numbers showed that the Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 used significantly less power than the Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 and performed nearly the same in the majority of our benchmarks. With less power consumption the processor puts off less heat, so another thumbs up for the Intel Core 2 Duo E7200. With nothing bad to say about the Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 and a rumored price at launch of $133, this is a value if we've seen one" so deff gonna wait wait awhile now but if you want full review here it is Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 Processor Review
__________________
__________________
If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker that came along would destroy civilization. A computer once beat me at chess But it was no match for me at kick boxing.
 My System: redden137
|
|
#2
9th Apr 2008, 18:54
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Not a fan of the lower FSB speed and the cache chopped in half.. That review didn't do any gaming tests, only 3dmark, and the reduction by like 4,000 marks is not a good sign. I would stick with the 8200/8400.
__________________
__________________
"I loved the P182 so much that, when my wife's system was all noisy and needed all sorts of cleaning, I bought her one. Then, when I wanted a cat, I bought a P182. The P182 is not a cat per se, but it's still an excellent buy."
My System: 日夏子
|
|
#3
10th Apr 2008, 04:18
|
|||
|
|||
|
I probably will stick with the E8400 because of the cache and as you say there are no gaming tests but those will come at a later date, until then im just going hold fire and wait for a few more reviews, in some eyes a lower fsb with less heat output just means more o/c potential, so ill wait just a bit longer,
__________________
If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker that came along would destroy civilization. A computer once beat me at chess But it was no match for me at kick boxing.
|
