Go Back   Computer Juice > Computer Hardware > CPUs, Motherboards & RAM
Register Points Site Spy New Posts Donate Unanswered Posts Search Forum Rules


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11th Feb 2008, 08:23 AM
No Avatar
mykul
 

 
Posts: n/a
Default Higher Single Core, Lower Dual Core

This may seem extremely n00besque, bear with me :P I've asked before whether a 3GHz DC would be better than a SC of the same clock speed, but would a DC running at 2.5GHz be faster than a SC running at 3GHz? Would a DC double 2.5GHz to 5GHz?
Digg this postDel.icio.us this postReddit this post Stumble this postFacebook this post
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11th Feb 2008, 10:17 AM
Macmac508's Avatar
Member Group
Intel Nvidia
Macmac508 is offline
 
Join Date: 21st Dec 2007
Last Online: 20th Oct 2008 12:59 PM
Posts: 139
iTrader: (0)
Macmac508 will become famous soon enoughMacmac508 will become famous soon enoughMacmac508 will become famous soon enough
Default Higher Single Core, Lower Dual Core

Yep thats right. Its doubled. Or Quadrupled if you get a quad core.

A lot of the core 2 duos at the moment you will find rated a lot lower than some of the old pentiums also. This doesnt mean they're slower. A 2.4Ghz Core 2 Duo will well out perform a 3Ghz Dual Core Pentium. Its not just about the frequency but the architechture of the chip.

Thats also why Core 2 Duos own AMD x64s at the moment, although they maybe rated higher in GHz the Core 2 is more effiecient and will run faster.
Digg this postDel.icio.us this postReddit this post Stumble this postFacebook this post
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11th Feb 2008, 08:42 PM
No Avatar
Carbon  United Nations
Donor Group
Intel ATi
Carbon is online now
 
Join Date: 3rd Jan 2008
Last Online: Today 01:23 PM
Posts: 1,583
iTrader: (0)
Carbon will become famous soon enoughCarbon will become famous soon enoughCarbon will become famous soon enough
Default Higher Single Core, Lower Dual Core

Yep thats right. Its doubled. Or Quadrupled if you get a quad core.
Wrong, wrong, wrong. Dual core does not double the clock speed, it only gives you two cores to work with at the same clock speed.

You are correct about the architecture though. A C2D simply works better than a P4, that's how it's designed, and clock speed differences won't matter nearly as much. You can also overclock C2Ds to well beyond P4 speeds.
__________________
Let me know via PM if I miss your hardware-related post! I try to answer everything I can, but some slip through the cracks.
__________________

My System: 日夏子

CPU(s):
Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 Conroe 3.00
Motherboard:
MSI P6N SLI Platinum LGA 775
RAM:
2GB Patriot Extreme Performance
Graphics Card(s):
PNY 8800GTS 320MB OC 660/951MHz
Sound Card:
Sound Blaster Xtremegamer 7.1
Hard Drive(s):
80GB + 500GB
Optical Drive(s):
2x SATA
Case / PSU:
Antec 900 + 620W Aerocool zeroDBA
Cooling:
200mm top + 2 120mm front + 80mm
Network / Internet:
Comcrap
Monitor(s):
2x Hanns-G JW199D @ 1440x900
Operating System(s):
Windows XP + Vista (Dual boot)

Digg this postDel.icio.us this postReddit this post Stumble this postFacebook this post
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12th Feb 2008, 01:55 PM
Macmac508's Avatar
Member Group
Intel Nvidia
Macmac508 is offline
 
Join Date: 21st Dec 2007
Last Online: 20th Oct 2008 12:59 PM
Posts: 139
iTrader: (0)
Macmac508 will become famous soon enoughMacmac508 will become famous soon enoughMacmac508 will become famous soon enough
Default Higher Single Core, Lower Dual Core

Okk, yeahh my bad.

I think what i was getting at was that it is a similar effect to having two processors working at similar clock speeds. Although these cannont always be put to good effect. Didnt really think before i answered that question.
Digg this postDel.icio.us this postReddit this post Stumble this postFacebook this post
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 16th Feb 2008, 01:19 AM
Klunk's Avatar
Klunk  Scotland
Member Group
 
Klunk is offline
 
Join Date: 24th Jan 2008
Last Online: 23rd Mar 2008 05:31 AM
Posts: 36
iTrader: (0)
Klunk is on a distinguished road
Default Higher Single Core, Lower Dual Core

@ Carbon
You're half right. You can use software to force-mount other CPU-demanding software onto both cores; whereas Windows XP/Vista is set to devide the tasks between the two cores.
So your half right, and so is Macmac.
=P
Digg this postDel.icio.us this postReddit this post Stumble this postFacebook this post
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 16th Feb 2008, 01:22 AM
No Avatar
Carbon  United Nations
Donor Group
Intel ATi
Carbon is online now
 
Join Date: 3rd Jan 2008
Last Online: Today 01:23 PM
Posts: 1,583
iTrader: (0)
Carbon will become famous soon enoughCarbon will become famous soon enoughCarbon will become famous soon enough
Default Higher Single Core, Lower Dual Core

Using two cores for separate tasks != the same clock speed for both cores. Total mhz is a product of the fsb and that's independent of how many cores you have. Really, clock speed should be generally ignored in this case.
__________________
Let me know via PM if I miss your hardware-related post! I try to answer everything I can, but some slip through the cracks.
__________________

My System: 日夏子

CPU(s):
Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 Conroe 3.00
Motherboard:
MSI P6N SLI Platinum LGA 775
RAM:
2GB Patriot Extreme Performance
Graphics Card(s):
PNY 8800GTS 320MB OC 660/951MHz
Sound Card:
Sound Blaster Xtremegamer 7.1
Hard Drive(s):
80GB + 500GB
Optical Drive(s):
2x SATA
Case / PSU:
Antec 900 + 620W Aerocool zeroDBA
Cooling:
200mm top + 2 120mm front + 80mm
Network / Internet:
Comcrap
Monitor(s):
2x Hanns-G JW199D @ 1440x900
Operating System(s):
Windows XP + Vista (Dual boot)

Digg this postDel.icio.us this postReddit this post Stumble this postFacebook this post
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 16th Feb 2008, 01:28 AM
Klunk's Avatar
Klunk  Scotland
Member Group
 
Klunk is offline
 
Join Date: 24th Jan 2008
Last Online: 23rd Mar 2008 05:31 AM
Posts: 36
iTrader: (0)
Klunk is on a distinguished road
Default Higher Single Core, Lower Dual Core

I agree. My shit-ass 4200+ is going to explode. (2.2GHz increased to 3GHz) =D
Digg this postDel.icio.us this postReddit this post Stumble this postFacebook this post
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 16th Feb 2008, 12:28 PM
No Avatar
naza911  United Kingdom
New Member Group
Intel Nvidia
naza911 is offline
 
Join Date: 16th Feb 2008
Last Online: 29th Oct 2008 11:37 AM
Posts: 3
iTrader: (0)
naza911 is on a distinguished road
Default Higher Single Core, Lower Dual Core

The Dual core will only be faster if the application supports dual core, so nearly all of the new application, saying that you still will get better performance out of the dual core
Digg this postDel.icio.us this postReddit this post Stumble this postFacebook this post
Reply With Quote

Please support this forum, donate towards our running costs.
Reply

Thread Tools
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dual Core or Quad Core gone8to1248 CPUs, Motherboards & RAM 13 11th Apr 2008 07:23 AM
Single Quad Core or Dual Quad Core Processors? Anonimouse CPUs, Motherboards & RAM 2 28th Jun 2007 11:33 PM
Dual Core Vs Quad Core Processors? ong_1988 CPUs, Motherboards & RAM 3 18th Mar 2007 09:22 PM
what are these dual core and quad core... xxxx CPUs, Motherboards & RAM 2 18th Mar 2007 09:22 PM
single core better than dual core in... Brian S CPUs, Motherboards & RAM 1 18th Mar 2007 03:40 PM


Copyright ©2006 - 2008 Computer Juice.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.