lesser-equity

Magazine
Go Back   Computer Juice > Computer Hardware > CPUs, Motherboards & RAM

Register


 Default 

Intel quad confusing




Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 31st Aug 2007, 12:32
Donor Group
 
Default Intel quad confusing

there is a q6600 wich costs £168.25 and q6600 go stepping wich costs £176.85 which is the best and what is go stepping.
__________________

My System: xX_TeK_GaMeR_Xx

Processor(s):
Intel Core 2 Duo E6700
Motherboard:
GIGABYTE GA-EP45-UD3P
RAM Memory:
OCZ 6400 2 x 2GB ReaperX
Graphics Card(s):
MSI NX8800GT
Sound Card:
Realtek ALC 889A Dolby Digital
Hard Drive(s):
OCZ SSD 60GB, WD 250GB HDD
Optical Drive(s):
LG HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GH22LS30
Case / PSU:
Cooler Master HAF-932, OCZ 600W
Cooling:
Stock
Network / Internet:
Ethernet, BT @ 2mb (250KB/S DL)
Monitor(s):
Xerox XA7-17i, SHARP LC26D44
Operating System(s):
Windows 7 Ultimate RC1 X32
  #2  
Old 1st Sep 2007, 07:34
Donor Group
 
Default Intel quad confusing

G0 stepping runs at 95watts, whereas B3 (the other one) runs at 105watts. Therefore G0 runs cooler, this makes a difference as qua cores run much otter than dual cores. I would recommend going for G0 if you can, especially if you are planning to overclock. I have a q6600 G0 (overclocked to 3Ghz) and I am really happy with it.

If you goole q6600 G0 should be able to find out more info.

Hope this helps
__________________

My System: The Elephant

Processor(s):
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Motherboard:
Asus P5K-E/Wi-fi
RAM Memory:
2GB Corsair XMS
Graphics Card(s):
Asus EN8600GT Silent
Sound Card:
Hard Drive(s):
Samsung HD501
Optical Drive(s):
Asus DRW-1814BLT
Case / PSU:
Antec P180/Corsair HX620
Cooling:
Thermalright Ultra-120 extreme
Network / Internet:
Monitor(s):
Dell 2005FPW 20 inch
Operating System(s):
Windows Vista Home Premium
  #3  
Old 1st Sep 2007, 12:53
Donor Group
 
Default Intel quad confusing

right but where im buying from th go stepping doesn't have any reviews but the standard one does and is rated 5/5 i think i'll study it more thnx for your help.
  #4  
Old 1st Sep 2007, 14:03
Donor Group
 
Default Intel quad confusing

a lot of people were waiting for g0 stepping because it's power conservative, just recently released, hence the lack of reviews
__________________

My System: hAvAAck Build 3

Processor(s):
Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 @ 2.67GHz
Motherboard:
Asus P5N-E
RAM Memory:
GSkill 4GB DDR2
Graphics Card(s):
EVGA Nvidia e-GeForce 8600GT
Sound Card:
onboard
Hard Drive(s):
Samsung 500GB @ 7200rpm
Optical Drive(s):
Dead
Case / PSU:
Generic Case, Generic PSU
Cooling:
Zalman 92mm
Network / Internet:
onboard
Monitor(s):
Dell 2408WFP Ultrasharp 2048 24"
Operating System(s):
MS Vista Ult, Ubuntu 7.10 64-Bit
  #5  
Old 1st Sep 2007, 16:29
Donor Group
 
Default Intel quad confusing

Quote:
Originally Posted by hAvAAck View Post
a lot of people were waiting for g0 stepping because it's power conservative, just recently released, hence the lack of reviews
right thnx, would this help overclocking cos i wnated to get it up to 3.4Ghz r summet.
  #6  
Old 1st Sep 2007, 16:31
Donor Group
 
Default Intel quad confusing

Quote:
Originally Posted by xactly View Post
right thnx, would this help overclocking cos i wnated to get it up to 3.4Ghz r summet.
that'd be alex's department I think
  #7  
Old 1st Sep 2007, 17:03
Donor Group
 
Default Intel quad confusing

For overclocking G0 is definately better as it will produce less heat at the same speed as B3. If you want to get 3.4Ghz, as many people have, you will have to get a different heatsink fan (the cpu cooler) as its unlikely that the intel stock one that comes with the chip will get you this far. The quads can get pretty hot so you will have to keep an eye on the temps when you are testing for stability.
  #8  
Old 2nd Sep 2007, 06:48
Donor Group
 
Default Intel quad confusing

Quote:
Originally Posted by xactly View Post
right thnx, would this help overclocking cos i wnated to get it up to 3.4Ghz r summet.
3.4ghz would be doable with decent air cooling. But it's all dependent on the individual chip. Not the brand, not the model, but the chip. There's no guarantee your cpu will clock higher at all. But. core2's tend to be decent overclockers. I've, personally, never failed to get less than a 30% increase in perfomance.

Problem is that quad-core core2's tend to be bandwidth hungry so if oc'ing is your game I'd be looking at a dual-core E6750. Had one of these upto 3.66ghz, stable, yesterday.

It's also going to depend on your motherboard and the voltages it can provide to the cpu. And a decent bios doesn't hurt either.

I believe (correct me if I'm wrong anyone) that the Go 6600 has a stock voltage of 1.35v. Dual-core core2's tend to have a stock voltage (V.I.D) of 1.3v. This lower voltage gives you that much more headroom for oc'ing.

As the 6600 is top-locked, you'd have to increase the fsb on the mobo to get an overclock.
__________________
heard wow is a better contraceptive then the pill, no joke i played rs for 2-3 years and 2 weeks after i stopped i lost my virginity.

-Kanoakavirus
__________________

My System: Zoomy

Processor(s):
E8400 @ 3.6ghz (400x9) @ 1.15v
Motherboard:
Asus P5K Premium
RAM Memory:
2GB Dominator 8500
Graphics Card(s):
BFG 8800GT
Sound Card:
Xfi Extremegamer
Hard Drive(s):
3.35TB ext storage. 2TB int storage
Optical Drive(s):
LG GGC H20L
Case / PSU:
Enermax 720w
Cooling:
AC7
Network / Internet:
Monitor(s):
245B, 931B (Samsung)
Operating System(s):
Vista 32P
  #9  
Old 2nd Sep 2007, 14:46
Donor Group
 
Default Intel quad confusing

i wasn't aiming for 3.4ghz (although it would be nice) but somewhere higher or around 3.0Ghz and my motherboard is gonna be asus p5n-e sli 650i i do plan to use stock coolng but if anybody knows a £30 better cooler for a quad then let me know but im getting water cooling next year.... i hope to anyway.
  #10  
Old 2nd Sep 2007, 17:48
Donor Group
 
Default Intel quad confusing

Like Alex said, 3.4 is doable on air but not with the stock cooler. You MAY be able to get it to 3Ghz with stock but its going to be be pretty hot, so may struggle, and not sure I'd recommend it.

In terms of coolers I use a Thermalright ultra 120 extreme with an S-flex fan. Its a really good cooler but not the cheapest in the world. I've read that the Scythe Ninja is pretty good but some people have had problems with the mounting. I've also heard of some people running on a Freezer 7 Pro. this is reasonably priced and will be better than stock but I think the Ninja will give slightly lower temps. I'm sure that others can recommend others.

Make sure you get good thermal grease too something like Arctic Silver 5, Arctic creamique (not sure of the spelling) or Mx-2. A good grease doesn't cost much but will lower your temps.

In terms of voltage, most people overclocking a Q6600 run below the stock voltage. At 3Ghz mine runs stable at 1.30v but others have been able to run stable at 1.25v or less. it depends on you chip so you have to experiment to see what works.
Reply

Register

Bookmarks

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 v Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 v Intel Core i7 920 v Intel Core i7 940 sajasio CPUs, Motherboards & RAM 5 2nd Mar 2009 23:00
Intel quad cores Cew27 CPUs, Motherboards & RAM 5 1st Apr 2008 12:25
Intel core 2 quad Cew27 CPUs, Motherboards & RAM 4 2nd Jan 2008 13:22
Amd quad or intel quad ?!?! Cew27 CPUs, Motherboards & RAM 3 19th Dec 2007 13:20
Intel Quad! craiig CPUs, Motherboards & RAM 4 9th Dec 2007 08:08
Thread Tools




Arabic Bulgarian Chinese (Simplified) Chinese (Traditional) Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Greek Hebrew Hungarian Italian Japanese Korean Latvian Lithuanian Norwegian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Serbian Slovak Spanish Swedish Thai Turkish Ukrainian

Copyright ©2006 - 2009 Computer Juice.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.