lesser-equity

Magazine
Go Back   Computer Juice > Computer Hardware > CPUs, Motherboards & RAM


Register


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #21  
Old 4th May 2007, 06:26
Member Group
 
just got a new box in for a client so i thought i'd post up the cpumark score

Test 1 1050
Test 2 413
Test 3 8403
Final 7473.5

Its a quad xeon e5335 @ 2GHz, i'm tempted to take it home tbh.
  #22  
Old 4th May 2007, 06:36
Member Group
 
another box we are 'setting' up for clients

Test 1 1096
Test 2 458
Test 3 8403
Final 7527

Its a dual xeon 3050 @ 2.13GHz, and it was still running exchange 07 in the background.
  #23  
Old 4th May 2007, 06:39
Administrator Group
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr_miller View Post
just got a new box in for a client so i thought i'd post up the cpumark score

Test 1 1050
Test 2 413
Test 3 8403
Final 7473.5

Its a quad xeon e5335 @ 2GHz, i'm tempted to take it home tbh.

So that's 8Ghz of processing power?

Interestingly its the same as the dual core (4Ghz ish) scores.
__________________

My System: Hybr!d

Processor(s):
AMD Turion 64 x2 TL-64 2.2GHz
Motherboard:
HP nForce 560
RAM Memory:
2GB DDR2 PC2-5300
Graphics Card(s):
Nvidia 7150M Onboard Integrated
Sound Card:
5.1 Onboard Integrated
Hard Drive(s):
250GB 5400RPM SATA300
Optical Drive(s):
18x CD/DVDRW-DL ATA
Case / PSU:
Stock HP
Cooling:
Stock HP
Network / Internet:
10/100 Nic / 10MB Virgin Cable
Monitor(s):
17" WXGA+ HD BrightView Widescreen
Operating System(s):
Windows 7 Ultimate 32Bit
  #24  
Old 4th May 2007, 07:23
Member Group
 
I was expecting a bigger score if i'm honest, but CPUMark seems to be more reliant on clock than cores. I'm not sure how it evaluates and produces the scores, as the super PI result was about 25 seconds on the quad and 33 on the dual for 1million digits.
  #25  
Old 4th May 2007, 07:29
Administrator Group
 
Thats a good point, the software may not be designed for more than 2 cores.....
  #26  
Old 4th May 2007, 16:00
New Member Group
 
This almost seems a bit inaccurate.

CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 @ 3.2 GhZ

  #27  
Old 4th May 2007, 16:09
Administrator Group
 
Thats a high result... is your PC overclocked?

Have you run the test again to confirm the score?
  #28  
Old 4th May 2007, 17:12
New Member Group
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Hybrid View Post
That a high result... is your PC overclocked?

Have you run the test again to confirm the score?
Yeah. it's overclocked to 3.2 Ghz. Still seems a bit high. here are results from a second test:

  #29  
Old 4th May 2007, 17:17
Administrator Group
 
That's probably about right.

The E6400 2.13/4.26 is 7500ish.

So an E6400 @ 3.2/6.4 is 50% more CPU power. 4.26 + 50% = 6.39.

7500 + 50% = 11250.

I really need to upgrade to what you have, you have 4x the power as me lol.

What m/board and ram are you running?
  #30  
Old 4th May 2007, 17:26
Administrator Group
 
On another thought it just shows how good these new intel chips are, overclocked 50%, thats mad.
Reply

Register
Thread Tools




Arabic Bulgarian Chinese (Simplified) Chinese (Traditional) Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Greek Hebrew Hungarian Italian Japanese Korean Latvian Lithuanian Norwegian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Serbian Slovak Spanish Swedish Thai Turkish Ukrainian

Copyright ©2006 - 2009 Computer Juice.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.