|
|
#1
30th Aug 2007, 11:44
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
now i currently have an AMD athlon 64 x2 dual core pro, 3800, 2ghz processor, most games comming out now are requiring more than 2ghz,
__________________
do i have to replace the entire motherboard to get a faster processor? that fact thats its dual core mean i have 2ghz twice? (i doubt it) and lastly does replacing the motherboard at all affect my hard drive, saved files etc etc?  cheers guys! My System: Mine
|
|
#2
30th Aug 2007, 11:49
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
As far as I know you have 4GHz as you have dual core.
__________________
And swapping a motherboard can render your Windows install useless, so be prepared to do a Windows repair or if need be a full install, backup first. My System: Hybr!d
|
|
#3
30th Aug 2007, 11:51
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
Quote:
Most motherboards support a faster processor, although not sure if you are s939 or am2 I do not think you have to upgrade your CPU, but maybe your Graphics card instead What kind of Graphics card do you own?
__________________
__________________
www.Trade4Free.ie
The real danger is not that computers will begin to think like men, but that men will begin to think like computers. Where there is no option, there can be no choice!  My System: Some other lover!
|
|
#4
30th Aug 2007, 11:56
|
|||
|
|||
|
i currently own a gefroce 7600 series, i know for a fact its now out of date compared to new releases, ive been thinking about buying a new one but not sure if itd make a difference, im thinking of splashing my student loan out on a 8400 ultra series
|
|
#5
30th Aug 2007, 12:55
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Regarding splashing out on a 8400 series. Err....don't.
A 7600 will wipe the floor with a 8400. If you're not fussed about DX10 gaming then look at a 7900GT or X1950XT. If you're wanting a DX10 card (running Vista or planning on it?) look at a 8600GTS or 320mb 8800GTS. Your cpu will, when paired with any of those cards (and at a res of 1280x1024), run pretty much any game thrown at it. It's still a good chip, I'd worry more (as Social says) about upgrading the graphics card. If you're gaming at a higher resolution than the one I've stated, those cards will still do, except for the 8600GTS, but you then might want to think about a faster cpu as it will begin causing bottlenecking at high detail settings/ AA. Considering the prices nowadays it won't be an expensive purchase of an AMD chip.
__________________
__________________
heard wow is a better contraceptive then the pill, no joke i played rs for 2-3 years and 2 weeks after i stopped i lost my virginity. -Kanoakavirus
My System: Zoomy
|
|
#6
30th Aug 2007, 12:58
|
|||
|
|||
|
hhhmmm well i currently have vista, got it with a bundle com like......
i cant play games such as bioshock unless its on minimal settings and a 1024 res.... infact i dont know any games i can run in high settings on a 1024 res..... vista eating it up? my processor is stated above and my ram is 2gb ... where am going wrong lol 
|
|
#7
30th Aug 2007, 13:15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ram amount is fine, the sweet spot for XP was 1gb, for Vista it's 2gb.
Vista does,as you suspect, demand more system resources. As you're having trouble running above 1024x768 I'd highly recommend a, at the least, 8600GTS or, preferably, a 320mb 8800GTS. And upgrading the cpu. Do you know what socket it is? (939, AM2)
__________________
heard wow is a better contraceptive then the pill, no joke i played rs for 2-3 years and 2 weeks after i stopped i lost my virginity. -Kanoakavirus
|
|
#8
30th Aug 2007, 13:27
|
|||
|
|||
|
right, unless you have patients with my, asking me about sockets, im clueless, ive got the computer right infront of me with the cover off as ive been fooling around with my ram sticks
|
|
#9
30th Aug 2007, 13:34
|
|||
|
|||
|
Run everest from the downloads section and post the CPU info here.
|
