lesser-equity

Magazine
Go Back   Computer Juice > Computer Hardware > Drives & Removable Media


Register


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10th Nov 2008, 09:19
Member Group
 
Hey guys, quick question.

i can fit 3 HDD's in my rig and I have the option of RAID 0, 1, or 5. I've narrowed the choice down to 320 GB 7200rpm and 500GB 5400rpm drives. I'm going to be doing alot of graphics work and game engine designs and such as well as playing games in general.

Assuming that I have a fast enough CPU and GPU for whatever I'd be doing, what setup would you recommend?

I was thinking 2 320's in RAID 0 and the 500GB standalone with my OS and all saved data on it with the 320's having the programs on it.

or just simply 3 500's.

lastly, does the 320 have a faster access time than the 500? or does the density increase outweigh the speed increase of the 320 for access time?
  #2  
Old 10th Nov 2008, 09:42
Donor Group
 
Logically, You should go with the highest RPMs with the biggest storage space. I think that more RPM gives faster access rates. Besides, if you're doing alot of graphical work and game design, you are going to need huge amounts of space in your PC. Go with the best RPM/Storage.
__________________
Well, i am officially a semipro musician
1st gig is the 7th of June 2009
__________________

My System: Deathstar 1.0/ Loaned MacBook

Processor(s):
Core 2 Quad/ Dual-Core
Motherboard:
New HP thing/ Macbook thing
RAM Memory:
4gb ddr2/ 1gb ddr2
Graphics Card(s):
nVidia GeForce 8600GT
Sound Card:
Intel(r) integrated
Hard Drive(s):
1tb SATA / Mac 120gb
Optical Drive(s):
Hitachi Blu-ray/ Integrated
Case / PSU:
HP stock/ Mac Stock
Cooling:
Your standard radiator and fan/Same
Network / Internet:
Intel(r) Integrated/ Mac AirPort
Monitor(s):
HP w2408/ Macbook thing
Operating System(s):
Vista sp1/ Mac OS X Leopard (10.5)
  #3  
Old 10th Nov 2008, 15:20
MJM
Donor Group
 
Generally, higher RPM will be faster, but another thing to consider is how many discs are in the hard drive.

carbon seems to know how many discs every hard drive has, so wait for his opinion.
__________________

My System: Toshiba Satellite A200-28P

Processor(s):
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100
Motherboard:
Mobile Intel PM965 Express Chipset
RAM Memory:
1024 + 2048MB DDR2 667
Graphics Card(s):
ATI HD 2600 XT
Sound Card:
Toshiba Bass Enhanced Sound System
Hard Drive(s):
200GB 5400RPM
Optical Drive(s):
DVD Super Multi
Case / PSU:
Satellite A200 Series
Cooling:
Stock
Network / Internet:
Intel 4965AGN
Monitor(s):
15.4" 1,280x800 Toshiba TruBrite
Operating System(s):
Windows Vista SP1 / Fedora i386
  #4  
Old 10th Nov 2008, 15:23
Donor Group
 
Like I said in your last thread RAID 0 is useless.

The platter density matters here but since you haven't named the drives there's no way for me to tell. 7200 will give an appreciative boost over a 5200RPM drive, platter density will also be a relatively large factor. I would recommend, if you can just slap anything in, just grabbing as many WD or Seagate 640GB drives as you can rather than bothering with the lower density ones, as they are dual-platter and have excellent speeds and are the best price per dollar around.
__________________
"I loved the P182 so much that, when my wife's system was all noisy and needed all sorts of cleaning, I bought her one. Then, when I wanted a cat, I bought a P182. The P182 is not a cat per se, but it's still an excellent buy."
__________________

My System: 日夏子

Processor(s):
Core 2 Duo E6400 2.13 -> 3.01ghz
Motherboard:
MSI P6N SLI Platinum LGA 775
RAM Memory:
2GB Patriot Extreme Performance
Graphics Card(s):
PNY 8800GTS 320MB
Sound Card:
Sound Blaster Xtremegamer 7.1
Hard Drive(s):
80GB + 500GB
Optical Drive(s):
2x SATA
Case / PSU:
Antec 900 + 620W Aerocool zeroDBA
Cooling:
4x 120mm Yate-Loon + 200mm top
Network / Internet:
Qwest
Monitor(s):
Dell 22" S2209W (1920x1080)
Operating System(s):
Windows XP + 7
  #5  
Old 10th Nov 2008, 15:54
Donor Group
 
I agree with that Carbon, however the Seagate barracuda 7200.11 320GB drive is single platter, so is very fast in comparison to all other drives (see this comparison) it's only second to the ridiculously expensive WD Velociraptor most of the time. However a duel platter 640GB drive could well be more sensible, as there would be much more space, without being much slower.
__________________

My System: First OC

Processor(s):
Intel E2180 @ 2.85
Motherboard:
Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L
RAM Memory:
2x1GB OCZ PC2-9200 reaper CL5
Graphics Card(s):
Gainward ATI 3850
Sound Card:
on board
Hard Drive(s):
Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 120GB
Optical Drive(s):
HITACHI DVD-ROM GD-2500
Case / PSU:
Corsair VX450
Cooling:
AC freezer7 Pro, 2x80mm, 1x90mm, 1x120mm
Network / Internet:
on board / supposedly 10Meg virgin cable
Monitor(s):
Viewsonic Vx922; Viewsonic VE702m
Operating System(s):
XP Home
Reply

Register
Thread Tools




Arabic Bulgarian Chinese (Simplified) Chinese (Traditional) Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Greek Hebrew Hungarian Italian Japanese Korean Latvian Lithuanian Norwegian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Serbian Slovak Spanish Swedish Thai Turkish Ukrainian

Copyright ©2006 - 2009 Computer Juice.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.