lesser-equity

Magazine
Go Back   Computer Juice > Computer Software > Multimedia & Codecs


Register


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 26th Mar 2008, 01:18
Donor Group
 


That's a neat post and it'll be useful. You closed it to questions though, so excuse this follow-up thread.

I've always presumed that a resident virus checker will block any malware codec that a user accepts because I've always assumed the internet-downloaded codec has to go to disk before it's run. Do you think that's so, or do you think it's straight-to-memory and avoids the real-time scan?

Why are these things called codecs anyway? The coding portions never exist with the decoder portions, the packs are all decoders, the coders are built into entirely different programs.
__________________

My System: Tim

Processor(s):
Athlon 64 3500+
Motherboard:
Asus A8N-VM CSM
RAM Memory:
Corsair PC3200 CL2 DDR-400 2GB
Graphics Card(s):
nVidia Geforce 6600 512MB
Sound Card:
Cherry RS 6000 M keyboard
Hard Drive(s):
Barracuda.7+ 2x200GB 58MB/s sustain
Optical Drive(s):
Samsung DVD-ROM TS-H352
Case / PSU:
Thermaltake Soprano
Cooling:
Stock
Network / Internet:
Telewest 2x20Mb/sec
Monitor(s):
SXGA flat panel
Operating System(s):
Slackware (2.6.27.7) (Fluxbox)
  #2  
Old 26th Mar 2008, 01:21
Donor Group
 
most of the above codecs are int he downloads section if not all of them
__________________
Im not a Geek!, Im Educated! - www.FossForums.com
__________________

My System: Cewy's wonder macine

Processor(s):
intel core 2 quad q6600 @ 3.2Ghz
Motherboard:
asus p5q deluxe
RAM Memory:
4 gig ocz 1066mhz sli
Graphics Card(s):
nvidia evga 8800 ultra ko
Sound Card:
onboard
Hard Drive(s):
750 gig seagate, 32meg cache
Optical Drive(s):
3 asus dvd writers, lightscribe
Case / PSU:
lian-li armoursuite pc-p60
Cooling:
tuniq tower
Network / Internet:
dual gigabit lan ports
Monitor(s):
24" dell 2408wfp
Operating System(s):
winfail vista 64 | ubuntu/arch linux
  #3  
Old 26th Mar 2008, 08:28
Moderator Group
 
A bad codec can attack just the browser itself as a dll or an activex control. Yes it will have to be installed but as I like to say, the biggest piece of malware ever created is the mouse. Antivirus is useless in many cases of careless clicking. It is a roll of the dice on if it will catch the malicious file before or after it is installed. Some malware has the ability to temporarily turn off security long enough to install itself. Then it won't be found until it is too late, if found at all. Once you click accept or yes (whatever the case may be) the AV is powerless.

Also if it is some new malicious file it may not be in the AV database yet so it won't be found by your AV anyway.
__________________

  #4  
Old 26th Mar 2008, 09:53
Donor Group
 
There's a very strict order to these things. AV packages scan what's saved to disk or loaded from disk, that's their focus. I agree that if the AV database doesn't identify the malware then the malware passes without being stopped. I'm not aware of any codec that downloads straight into memory and executes without a prior disk save. The writers of the players are aware of the danger of allowing that.

There are two types of malware. There's the sort that burrows in through buffer overflows and executes without getting saved first, or which rely on script language security holes. They can and do try to turn off the security before embedding themselves permanently. That mechanism simply isn't available to malware which is downloaded or arrives as an email attachment, all of which have to be saved first before they can be executed.

Anyway - the "click yes to run" variety simply has to come off the disk, there's no mechanism in the operating system to accept before it's stored. All of those have been AV-scanned, assuming there's a resident AV scanner.
  #5  
Old 26th Mar 2008, 09:56
Moderator Group
 
Are you saying that there is no malware embedded in codecs?

EDIT: Fake codecs.
__________________

  #6  
Old 26th Mar 2008, 10:04
Donor Group
 
Of course not, they're famed for having them.

I'm saying that a fake codec can't run and deliver its payload before it's been saved to disk.

If there's a resident AV scanner then it would have to be unrecognized for it to be effective. I don't think there's a significant proportion which would go unrecognized. Consequently I think having a resident AV scanner is a reasonable protection against the fake codec route of infection.
  #7  
Old 26th Mar 2008, 10:11
Moderator Group
 
I see your point and it is valid, only I have seen first hand (in the malware forum) the damage the fake codecs can cause. It is a very common way of infecting a computer. An AV is a layer of protection but far from a catch all, even for known threats. Depending what is written into the file you can be infected with the whole spectrum of virus/trojan/worm etc.

See this post for a better explanation.
__________________

Reply

Register
Thread Tools




Arabic Bulgarian Chinese (Simplified) Chinese (Traditional) Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Greek Hebrew Hungarian Italian Japanese Korean Latvian Lithuanian Norwegian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Serbian Slovak Spanish Swedish Thai Turkish Ukrainian

Copyright ©2006 - 2009 Computer Juice.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.