Guys Can You Do Something for Me.

**Carbon** · #21 9th Mar 2009, 18:32

About 2.5s on the CJ page and 1.5s on the other. Still seems to be a lot of latency, but since it's US -> UK I suppose that's to be expected and the other one has more hops.

CJ:

Quote:

1 <1 ms <1 ms 1 ms home [192.168.0.1]
2 42 ms 41 ms 41 ms spkn-dsl-gw08-200.spkn.qwest.net [207.225.41.200
]
3 43 ms 41 ms 41 ms spkn-agw1.inet.qwest.net [207.225.41.141]
4 41 ms 41 ms 41 ms spk-core-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.153.5]
5 46 ms 41 ms 49 ms spk-core-02.inet.qwest.net [205.171.153.66]
6 49 ms 51 ms 51 ms tuk-core-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.8.90]
7 70 ms 69 ms 70 ms snj-core-01.inet.qwest.net [67.14.34.14]
8 69 ms 68 ms 68 ms sjp-brdr-02.inet.qwest.net [205.171.214.42]
9 68 ms 68 ms 70 ms 63.146.26.42
10 209 ms 209 ms 208 ms mobile-star-10143.9-1-0-6-0.ar1.CHI1.gblx.net [2
04.246.200.6]
11 209 ms 260 ms 273 ms 87.239.17.11
12 208 ms 206 ms 275 ms 87.239.16.211

vs this on the money-clues site

Quote:

1 1 ms 1 ms <1 ms home [192.168.0.1]
2 42 ms 41 ms 41 ms spkn-dsl-gw08-200.spkn.qwest.net [207.225.41.200
]
3 42 ms 41 ms 41 ms spkn-agw1.inet.qwest.net [207.225.41.141]
4 42 ms 41 ms 41 ms spk-core-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.153.5]
5 42 ms 41 ms 43 ms spk-core-02.inet.qwest.net [205.171.153.66]
6 50 ms 51 ms 49 ms tuk-core-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.8.90]
7 50 ms 51 ms 51 ms sea-core-01.inet.qwest.net [67.14.1.194]
8 49 ms 51 ms 49 ms sea-brdr-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.26.54]
9 52 ms 51 ms 51 ms 63.146.27.138
10 76 ms 58 ms 58 ms hr2-te-1-0-1.irvine2oc2.savvis.net [204.70.204.1
66]
11 54 ms 56 ms 53 ms cr2-pos-0-3-0-1.Seattle.savvis.net [204.70.200.7
7]
12 124 ms 125 ms 127 ms cr1-pos-0-0-0-0.NewYork.savvis.net [204.70.192.1
02]
13 126 ms 126 ms 125 ms 204.70.197.5
14 127 ms 128 ms 128 ms 216.89.82.118
15 129 ms 133 ms 128 ms 208.116.63.206
16 128 ms 125 ms 128 ms 65.98.58.218
17 131 ms 128 ms 127 ms 65.98.104.121

The main page is 9.5s for me now and userCP is 6s. There also seems to be an intermittent bug with the usercp where it refreshes again after loading for some reason. I've never been able to reproduce it but it's popped up once in a while.

**Hybr!d** · #22 9th Mar 2009, 18:51

ok thanks, i use all these testers but real results are in the people.

Going to get the full site up on the US server for some more testing tomorrow I think before I make a decision.

Cheers.

**Hybr!d** · #23 9th Mar 2009, 19:02

Scrub that, will probably have it all cloned to the other sever shortly.

Carbon, seeing as you are reporting the biggest issues I hope you don't mind being my guinea pig.

**Hybr!d** · #24 9th Mar 2009, 19:02

Oh and what ISP speed/service you on?

**Carbon** · #25 9th Mar 2009, 21:21

Qwest DSL, 1.5mbps iirc. Not that fast but other stuff loads a lot quicker!

**Hybr!d** · #26 10th Mar 2009, 09:22

This is basically a clone of what we have here, but on a US server, what is is like for everyone compared to currently.?

It is important you have your say as moving to the US will probably impact them in a positive way but I need to be sure and also that we do not make it slow for other country's, like the UK.

<dead url removed>

**philthomas** · #27 10th Mar 2009, 10:06

Fairly good here .... about 2 secs to load

**Hybr!d** · #28 10th Mar 2009, 10:14

How does it compare to currently, I expect it to be sloer as you are UK based and the new server is US.

I'm just trying to gauge if the US server will benifit US users and not impact UK too much.

Thanks.

**serverguy** · #29 10th Mar 2009, 10:53

It feels considerably slower for me here than the UK based one.

**serverguy** · #30 10th Mar 2009, 10:56

Saying that it's not bad either. TBH I don't know if I would of noticed the difference normally.

What we need, is one database server on a nice fast pipe, and then a webserver in both the US and the UK, which can serve up the images nice and quickly :):)