[Hybr!d]

Originally Posted by serverguy

Saying that it's not bad either. TBH I don't know if I would of noticed the difference normally.

What we need, is one database server on a nice fast pipe, and then a webserver in both the US and the UK, which can serve up the images nice and quickly :):)

You read my mind, I literally just emailed my host asking about that.

---------------------------------

Carbon; what say you?

[evilfantasy]

I think it's a bit faster now then before the upgrade. I have a very fast connection so unless there is a major problem I never see much differences in speeds.

[Hybr!d]

Originally Posted by evilfantasy

I think it's a bit faster now then before the upgrade. I have a very fast connection so unless there is a major problem I never see much differences in speeds.

Upgrade? Do you mean the money-clues US clone is faster?

[evilfantasy]

No I mean before you upgraded the forums a few days ago.

[Hybr!d]

Ok thats good. How is the US server for you mate? Better?

[evilfantasy]

Seems about the same. I'm on my wireless right now so both have a short lag. Nothing out of the ordinary for this computer though.

[philthomas]

I would say there is only about 1 sec between the two, but I am on 20mb connection.

[Carbon]

Yeah, difference is pretty small for me too. 7s vs 9.5s on CJ or so.

[4D(Fordy(Ford) Ollie]

Originally Posted by philthomas

Dont know if you want another UK measure or not Dave, but here it is anyway :

IE7 and Firefox 3.05 no noticeable difference.

New site less than a second ---- Current site 2 seconds

I get the same, don't use IE but firefox is good, Opera a second or two behind.

Safari - unbearably shocking, but so is everything about Safari.

Chrome, same as IE